Location:  Home » Political History » Gendered Compromises: Political Cultures and the State in Chile, 1920-1950    

Gendered Compromises: Political Cultures and the State in Chile, 1920-1950

Gendered Compromises: Political Cultures and the State in Chile, 1920-1950Author: Karin Alejandra Rosemblatt
Publisher: The University of North Carolina Press
Category: Book

List Price: $59.95
Buy Used: $16.90
as of 2/7/2012 21:27 PST details
You Save: $43.05 (72%)

In Stock
Buy

Used (4) from $16.90

Seller: mountain

Languages: English (Unknown), English (Original Language), English (Published)
Media: Paperback
Pages: 368
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.7
Dimensions (in): 9.6 x 6.4 x 1.1

ISBN: 0807825670
EAN: 9780807825679

Shipping: Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours

Also Available In:

  • Paperback - Gendered Compromises: Political Cultures and the State in Chile, 1920-1950
  • Paperback - Gendered Compromises: Political Cultures & the State in Chile, 1920-1950.
  • Paperback - Gendered Compromises: Political Cultures and the State in Chile, 1920-1950

Similar Items:


Editorial Reviews:

Product Description
With this book, Karin Rosemblatt presents a gendered history of the politics and political compromise that emerged in Chile during the 1930s and 1940s, when reformist popular-front coalitions held power. While other scholars have focused on the economic realignments and novel political pacts that characterized Chilean politics during this era, Rosemblatt explores how gender helped shape Chile's evolving national identity.

Rosemblatt examines how and why the aims of feminists, socialists, labor activists, social workers, physicians, and political leaders converged around a shared gender ideology. Tracing the complex negotiations surrounding the implementation of new labor, health, and welfare policies, she shows that professionals in health and welfare agencies sought to regulate gender and sexuality within the working class and to consolidate the male-led nuclear family as the basis of societal stability. Leftists collaborated in these efforts because they felt that strong family bonds would generate a sense of class belonging and help unify the Left, while feminists perceived male familial responsibility as beneficial for women. Diverse actors within civil society thus reworked the norms of masculinity and femininity developed by state agencies and political leaders--even as others challenged those ideals.


In Stock
Buy